SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
                          Civil Division

TAX ANALYSTS and AARON DAVIS,            )
              Plaintiffs,                )
                                         )
     v.                                  )   No. 2020 CA 1999 B
                                         )   Judge Matini
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,                    )   Next event: 26 July 2024, 10 A.M.
               Defendant.                )   (Further status conference)



           OTR’S INITIAL PRODUCTION OF 107 PAGES OF
      PRIVATE LETTER RULINGS WITH PAGINATION INSERTED




               (Submitted by plaintiffs as an appendix to their
             July 2024 response to OTR’s revised Vaughn index)
                              GOVERNMENT OF     nm DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
                                 OFFICE OF THE CHlBF FlNANCJ:AL OFFICER

                                                  ***
                                      OFFICE OF TAX.AND REVENUE




pi[J.ce of tile Genel'alCouns@!
                                              JllJlUary 28, 2016




                      Re: .         .             for District of Cobimbia Tu lblling
                                   DJstriet of Columbia Sales and Use Tax.

   l)ear·
    Thill oorrespondence responds to your private letter ruling for
    regarding District ofColumbia sales and use tax. Thill ruling idi,ll!!ed on the facts provided and
    eurrent law. You t\llMO't rely on this ruling if the facts, law ori:egulatlons subsequently ohange,
      I,    ISSUE
    Are·             services subject w mues tw. and use tax?
     ll.     CONCLUSION




                                                                                                          1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
                 GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
                    OFFICE OF THE CHIBF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                         OFFICE OF TAX AND REVENUE
                                            ***
                                            M M
OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL

                                    Febniary 23, 2017




                   Re: Request for District of Columbia Tax Ruling
                       Distl'ict of Columbia Sales and Use Tax

Dear
This co1respo11dence responds to your private letter ruling reqi1est regarding District of
Columbia (fue "Dish-ict") sales tax, This ruling is based on the facts provided and current
law. You cannot rely on this ruling if the foots, law, or regulations subsequently change,

I. ISSUE

   1. Are                   installation fees to District of Columbia customers subject to
       sales and use tax?

 II. FACTS




                                                                                              33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107